Supreme Court won't review North Carolina's decision to nix license plates with Confederate flag

Argentina Noticias Noticias

Supreme Court won't review North Carolina's decision to nix license plates with Confederate flag
Argentina Últimas Noticias,Argentina Titulares
  • 📰 WOKVNews
  • ⏱ Reading Time:
  • 17 sec. here
  • 2 min. at publisher
  • 📊 Quality Score:
  • News: 10%
  • Publisher: 63%

The Supreme Court says it won’t review North Carolina’s decision to stop issuing specialty license plates with the Confederate flag

FILE - The Supreme Court is seen on April 21, 2023, in Washington. A unanimous Supreme Court has given a 94-year-old Minneapolis woman a new chance to recoup some money after the county kept the entire $40,000 when it sold her condominium over a small unpaid tax bill. The justices ruled Thursday, May 25, that Hennepin County, Minnesota violated the constitutional rights of the woman, Geraldine Tyler, by taking her property without paying “just compensation.

North Carolina offers three standard license plates and more than 200 specialty plates. Civic clubs including the Sons of Confederate Veterans can create specialty plates by meeting specific requirements. The state said it would consider alternate artwork for the plates' design if it does not contain the Confederate flag.

Hemos resumido esta noticia para que puedas leerla rápidamente. Si estás interesado en la noticia, puedes leer el texto completo aquí. Leer más:

WOKVNews /  🏆 247. in US

Argentina Últimas Noticias, Argentina Titulares

Similar News:También puedes leer noticias similares a ésta que hemos recopilado de otras fuentes de noticias.

Supreme Court won’t review North Carolina’s decision to nix license plates with Confederate flagSupreme Court won’t review North Carolina’s decision to nix license plates with Confederate flagThe Supreme Court said Monday it won’t review North Carolina’s decision to stop issuing specialty license plates with the Confederate flag.
Leer más »

Supreme Court can acknowledge affirmative action as reverse discriminationSupreme Court can acknowledge affirmative action as reverse discriminationThe dream of an America where all men and women were considered equal under the law has always been an unfinished masterpiece.
Leer más »

Republicans set to lose multiple seats due to Supreme Court rulingRepublicans set to lose multiple seats due to Supreme Court rulingNAACP president Derrick Johnson welcomed the Supreme Court's decision as a 'triumph for our democracy.'
Leer más »

Why the Supreme Court Declined an Opportunity to Diminish the Voting Rights ActWhy the Supreme Court Declined an Opportunity to Diminish the Voting Rights ActIn a new Q. & A., IChotiner speaks with ruthgreenwood about the Supreme Court’s recent ruling on Allen v. Milligan, which determined that Alabama’s redistricting had illegally diluted the power of Black voters.
Leer más »

Supreme Court endorses race-based districtingSupreme Court endorses race-based districtingChief Justice John Roberts famously wrote in a 2006 political redistricting case that “it is a sordid business, this divvying us up by race.” In a landmark redistricting decision on June 8, Roberts engaged in exactly this sordid business.
Leer más »

US Supreme Court Kicks American Wetlands When They're DownIt appears the Court's right-wing majority wants to open the floodgates to polluters even as we continue to learn more about just how connected wetlands are to bigger bodies of water and also to our entire way of life​.
Leer más »



Render Time: 2025-04-14 11:41:13