The Supreme Court ruled that race-conscious admission policies of Harvard College and the University of North Carolina violate the Constitution, bringing an end to affirmative action in higher education. Read the decision here:
in higher education in a decision that will reverberate across campuses nationwide.
The court fell along ideological lines in the pair of cases, 6-3 and 6-2, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson recusing herself in the Harvard case. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion covering both disputes., known as Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. University of North Carolina:
Argentina Últimas Noticias, Argentina Titulares
Similar News:También puedes leer noticias similares a ésta que hemos recopilado de otras fuentes de noticias.
Read the Supreme Court's ruling against affirmative actionThe court ruled against race-conscious admissions programs in higher education.
Leer más »
Read the dissents in the Supreme Court ruling against affirmative actionJustices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson each wrote dissents in the court's decision against race-conscious admissions practices in higher education.
Leer más »
Read the Supreme Court’s decision on affirmative actionRead the full decision, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented.
Leer más »
Supreme Court news: Why 6-3 conservative court has Obama, Schumer, and Pelosi cheeringDemocrats are cheering for the conservative majority Supreme Court after a Tuesday ruling in Moore v. Harper, saying the rejection of the so-called independent state legislature theory marked a win for voting rights.
Leer más »
Summit County judge achieves re-certification from Ohio Supreme Court for Valor Court ProgramPresiding Judge Susan Baker Ross earned a final certificate from the Ohio Supreme Court's Commission on Specialized Dockets for the Valor Court.
Leer más »
Supreme Court Strikes Blow to the Right’s Favorite Fringe Legal TheorySix out of nine justices soundly rejected the Independent State Legislature theory, preventing state legislatures from seizing unprecedented control over the election process.
Leer más »