A lawyer who used ChatGPT to help him prepare a court case has had to apologize after it was found that the chatbot had invented some of the information.
There’s been much talk in recent months about how the new wave of AI-powered chatbots, ChatGPT among them, could upend numerous industries, including the legal profession.
Related The airline, Avianca, asked the judge to dismiss the case, so Mata’s legal team put together a brief citing half a dozen similar cases that had occurred in an effort to persuade the judge to let their client’s case proceed, the New York Times reported. Schwartz told the judge he had not used ChatGPT before and “therefore was unaware of the possibility that its content could be false.”
Looking at what he described as a legal submission full of “bogus judicial decisions, with bogus quotes and bogus internal citations,” and describing the situation as unprecedented, Judge Castel has ordered a hearing for early next month to consider possible penalties.
Argentina Últimas Noticias, Argentina Titulares
Similar News:También puedes leer noticias similares a ésta que hemos recopilado de otras fuentes de noticias.
I'm worried about Nvidia bringing ChatGPT-style AI to games | Digital TrendsNvidia is bringing ChatGPT-style generative AI to video games with Nvidia ACE, and I'm equal parts excited and worried.
Leer más »
Nvidia's supercomputer may bring on a new era of ChatGPT | Digital TrendsNvidia has just announced the DGX GH200, an AI supercomputer equipped with previously unseen power. It might bring big advancements to generative AI.
Leer más »
Lawyer apologizes for fake court citations from ChatGPTChatGPT repeatedly claimed fake cases were real in its conversation with Steven Schwartz.
Leer más »
Lawyer apologizes for fake court citations from ChatGPTChatGPT repeatedly claimed fake cases were real in its conversation with Steven Schwartz.
Leer más »
Lawyer uses ChatGPT in court and now 'greatly regrets' itA New York attorney has admitted to using ChatGPT for his legal research after a court filing alleged that “six of the submitted cases” were non-existent and false. He admitted it was his first time using ChatGPT for legal research and didn’t know errors were possible.
Leer más »
A lawyer used ChatGPT to write a legal brief that was completely 'bogus'Neither the defendant's lawyers nor the judge could find the citations the plaintiff's lawyer had submitted.
Leer más »