Is John Roberts’ new stance on voting rights actually institutionalist performance art?
These links will only work if you're on the device you listen to podcasts on. We do not support Stitcher at this time.We are showing you options for a computer but if you're on a phone or tablet.
These links will only work if you're on the device you listen to podcasts on. We do not support Stitcher at this time.We are showing you options for a computer but if you're on a phone or tabletArgentina Últimas Noticias, Argentina Titulares
Similar News:También puedes leer noticias similares a ésta que hemos recopilado de otras fuentes de noticias.
John Roberts and Brett Kavanaugh Really Did Just Save the Voting Rights ActThe 5–4 decision is a huge victory for multi-racial democracy that sends a scathing message to red state lawmakers.
Leer más »
John Roberts and Brett Kavanaugh Just Delivered the Surprise of the Supreme Court TermThe Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision on Thursday found that Alabama’s congressional map violates the Voting Rights Act’s ban on racial dilution. Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined the liberal justices in the majority. From mjs_DC:
Leer más »
Why John Roberts Reversed Himself This Time on Voting RightsThere is a story we’ve been telling about Chief Justice John Roberts. It's wrong.
Leer más »
Supreme Court rules against Alabama in high-stakes Voting Rights Act caseChief Justice John Roberts authored the majority opinion, finding Alabama's redistricting plan likely violated a key provision of the Voting Rights Act.
Leer más »
Supreme Court rules in favor of Black Alabama voters in unexpected defense of Voting Rights ActChief Justice John Roberts and Justice Brett Kavanaugh joined with the court’s liberals in affirming a lower-court ruling that found a likely violation in an Alabama congressional map.
Leer más »